Alex Goldstein NBC News management now rokm that it had no idea whatsoever that Lauer had a problem with women until it received a lone harassment report in that led to his firing.
But that is hard to countenance. I was in that studio for just 20 minutes before I observed Lauer behave oddly with a woman. roon
Women are coming forward with disturbing and believable stories; the network is under enough pressure that it has agreed to release former employees from the nondisclosure agreements they ed before rom Today. It is a lurid and wretched.
She went to his hotel room where, she says, he pushed her against a door and kissed her. She says Lauer then forced her to have sex, although she was far too drunk to consent.
At one point, he sodomized her. I remember thinking, is this normal?
Matt lauer’s woman problem
In response to the allegation, Lauer made wwomen first public comments on the firing in the form of an open letter that simmers with anger and the insistence that the relationship, including the night in Sochi, was fully consensual. He implies that Nevils was motivated to make her report by a dangerous combination of sexual jealousy, romantic disappointment, and avarice.
The impression I take from that exchange is that Lauer was anxious that she might be angry about what happened and was checking in to see whether she was going to be a problem.
At one point, Nevils says, Lauer asked her whether she had told Vieira about what happened. She said no. Having the affair linger after they return to work is not uncommon either.
Sexual violence is preventable | cdc
The workplace may be the last place in America where expectations regarding sex are crystal clear, repeatedly explained, and enforced by the larger culture. It does.
Most medium and large-size employers have the same workplace policy regarding sexual harassment: Senior people cannot have sexual relationships with junior ones. The power difference between Lauer and Nevils is about as large as you can find in any company.
Catharine A. A roast of Lauer that took place before the MeToo movement—a roast attended by his colleagues and bosses—included well-received and knowing jokes about his tendency to become involved with young women at the network.
The revelations about Lauer have disgusted and unsettled me like few other stories in the MeToo era. That is because Today had a single, unvarying ethos: respect for women.
From its earliest incarnation more than 65 years ago, that show has served the women all across the country who are at home raising children and taking care of people. How many wpmen of American children were raised while their nearby mothers sipped coffee and paused to watch a Today segment about how to make a household budget, or wean a baby, or help cope with bullying? There was uplift and distraction and information in that show, all of it created for the women who quietly did some of the most important work in the country.
But it was a performance to which they gave their all—especially Lauer, who was excellent in the role.